Unrestricted Warfare

Changing Dynamics of Modern Warfare and the Role of Major States

From Opinion: Crimson Chronicles

Here is the concise form of today’s Dawn e-paper opinion which is about the 5th generation war. Here is the link to the parent article:

https://www.dawn.com/news/1789769

1. The Evolution of Warfare Communication

The evolution of communication technology has profoundly altered the dissemination of information regarding warfare, fundamentally transforming the nature of conflicts and their societal impact. Throughout history, the transmission of battle outcomes to distant regions experienced a gradual evolution, from the prolonged wait endured during ancient times to the immediacy facilitated by modern mediums. Here below is the graphical representation of the war theory.

Ancient Communication Lag

In ancient eras, the propagation of battle news incurred significant delays, often spanning weeks or even months. For instance, the temporal gap between Alexander the Great’s triumph over Porus in 326 BCE and its transmission to Greece emphasizes the considerable duration involved in communicating victories or defeats across vast territories. Similarly, in 1776, the communication lag led to King George III’s belated realization of losing the American colonies a month after the Declaration of Independence.

Technological Advancements’ Impact

However, the advent of telegraph and radio revolutionized warfare communication, condensing the temporal gap. Wellington’s victory over Napoleon in 1815 remarkably reached London’s Whitehall within a mere three days. The subsequent evolution, particularly the telegraph and radio, enabled real-time reporting of modern conflicts, significantly altering the perception and immediacy of war-related information.

Modern Real-Time Warfare Communication

The contemporary era has witnessed a paradigm shift in communication dynamics, epitomized by the intrusion of war into domestic spaces through satellite television. The event in May 2011, where US Navy SEALs invaded Pakistan to eliminate Osama bin Laden, symbolizes this transformation. President Obama, Secretary Clinton, and Washington’s officials observed the operation in real-time, highlighting how warfare has transcended geographic barriers, reaching directly into family lounges through satellite television.

Shifting Dynamics: Retaliation and Preemptive Actions

The dynamics of warfare have shifted from a sequential order of provocation followed by retaliation to a scenario where retaliation often precedes any apparent provocation. This transformation signifies a departure from traditional patterns of conflict escalation.

Changing Precedence in Conflict Resolution

Previously, conflicts adhered to a discernible sequence where provocations prompted retaliatory actions. However, contemporary scenarios witness an inversion of this order. The immediacy and directness of modern warfare, exacerbated by instantaneous communication, have blurred the boundaries between provocation and retaliation.

Contemporary Suspicions and Geopolitical Implications

Contemporary suspicions surrounding the orchestration of certain catastrophic events, such as the 9/11 attacks, underscore the complex geopolitical landscape. Speculations regarding internal involvement within the US, potentially with foreign aid, hint at the intricate and contentious nature of global politics.

Allegations and Their Impact

The conjecture suggesting premeditation behind the 9/11 attacks, implicating forces within the US and involving Saudi citizens, reflects the prevalence of skepticism regarding the true motives and orchestrators of significant global incidents. These suspicions, if substantiated, have far-reaching implications, influencing geopolitical alliances and perceptions of global security.

The evolution of communication technology has indelibly altered the immediacy, perception, and dynamics of warfare, transcending physical boundaries and reshaping the nature of conflicts in unprecedented ways

• A Geopolitical Puzzle Unveiled

The shadows cast upon the alleged involvement of key figures in pivotal events, particularly the role ascribed to Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the former Saudi ambassador to the US, and his purported indirect funding of the 9/11 hijackers, raise poignant questions. Amid the redacted sensitive pages from the final 9/11 Commission report, a veil of secrecy shrouds critical details, leaving one to ponder the intricacies of Saudi and UAE nationals with US pilot licenses participating in a meticulously planned suicide mission. As inquiries mount about their families’ welfare, parallel enigmas arise concerning the procurement of 5,000 rockets by Hamas for its pre-emptive strike on Israel. The foresight displayed by the assailants suggests an anticipation of the dire repercussions, surpassing the initial strike’s magnitude.

Post-Apocalyptic Conundrums

The aftermath of such catastrophic events prompts contemplation about the ensuing repercussions. The satirical film “The Mouse that Roared” serves as a curious allegory, where a small European duchy orchestrates its reconstruction post-war by surreptitiously leveraging American generosity towards defeated nations. A stark comparison emerges with the fate of Palestine, poised on the brink of obliteration. The projection of its annihilation, leading to a dollar-funded reconstruction giving rise to an expanded Israel, paints a grim picture. Ironically, the demise of Palestine could paradoxically culminate as the ‘final solution’ to the age-old Palestinian issue.

Victims of Geopolitical Agendas

The envisioned solution aligns with the interests of an assertive Israel, supported by its unwavering ally, the United States. It also aligns with the narratives of an ineffectual UN and a complacent Muslim ummah, akin to an ostrich, evading reality. However, the grim reality belies the plight of innocent infants, unwittingly embroiled in geopolitical strife. Their struggle transcends territorial ambitions, as they fight not for land but for the very breath they take, facing the bleak prospect of minimal resting space in a grave.

• The Perpetuation of Undocumented Atrocities

The annals of history often reflect a biased narrative, accentuating victories while downplaying or altogether omitting the darker chapters. Post-World War II, the Western media swiftly embarked on a campaign of glorifying triumphs and vilifying adversaries. Notably, Lord Russell of Liverpool’s publications, “The Scourge of the Swastika” (1954) and “The Knights of Bushido” (1958), meticulously cataloged German and Japanese atrocities, albeit avoiding specific nationality references.

Historical Disparities and Omissions

Curiously absent from mainstream documentation are comprehensive volumes chronicling war crimes committed by the US and its allies post-1945. The notable absence of such records in the White House library alludes to the selective preservation of historical narratives, possibly driven by deliberate oversight or an inherent bias.

Selective Rhetoric and Historical Neglect

The rhetoric espoused by former President Ronald Reagan regarding the sanctity of human life stands in stark contrast to the historical documentation of post-war conflicts. Reagan’s transition from Hollywood comedy to political leadership paradoxically embodies a juxtaposition between articulated ideals and historical realities.

Unveiling Historical Inequities

The conspicuous absence of extensive literature scrutinizing post-World War II war crimes committed by the US and its allies highlights a poignant inequity in historical documentation. The disparity in chronicling atrocities across different geopolitical spheres underscores the selective nature of historical preservation and the inherent biases ingrained within it.

---

Difficult Words:

1. Intricacies: Complexities or details of a situation.
2. Pivotal: Crucial or central to a matter or event.
3. Veil of Secrecy: A shroud of concealment or hidden information.
4. Allegory: A symbolic representation or story conveying a deeper meaning.
5. Annals: Historical records or accounts.
6. Vilifying: Criticizing or disparaging someone harshly.
7. Meticulously: Thoroughly or with great attention to detail.
8. Espoused: Adopted or supported a belief or idea.

Credit :Farhan Khan

If you have any queries regarding the article or about the preparation, feel free to ask in the comment section.